Concerns over a possible NBC broadcaster gag have intensified after former Vice President Atiku Abubakar, the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project, and Amnesty International criticised a recent directive issued by the National Broadcasting Commission to media organisations. The directive, released on April 17, 2026, warned broadcasters against breaches of the Nigeria Broadcasting Code, including expressing personal opinions and failing to maintain neutrality.
The NBC broadcaster gag debate follows the commission’s formal notice to broadcasters citing increasing violations of professional standards in political and current affairs programming. The NBC stated that its directive was aimed at ensuring compliance with the Nigeria Broadcasting Code, particularly as the country approaches another electoral cycle.
Regulatory oversight of broadcast media in Nigeria is carried out by the NBC, which is responsible for enforcing standards related to fairness, balance, and professionalism in broadcasting. However, directives issued during politically sensitive periods often attract scrutiny from stakeholders concerned about press freedom and editorial independence.
Reacting to the directive, Atiku Abubakar described it as “yet another troubling attempt to muzzle the media and shrink the space for free expression in Nigeria.” He added, “I stand firmly with Nigeria’s broadcast industry and all media platforms resisting this creeping censorship.”
The Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project, in a letter dated April 18, 2026, urged President Bola Tinubu to order the withdrawal of the directive. SERAP stated, “The NBC’s notice represents a dangerous attempt to impose prior censorship on the media and suppress legitimate journalistic expression.”
The organisation further argued that the directive relies on vague provisions that could enable arbitrary enforcement and undermine constitutional guarantees of freedom of expression. It warned that failure to withdraw the notice could result in legal action.
Amnesty International also criticised the directive, describing it as an “outrageous and desperate attempt” to restrict journalists. The organisation said the notice imposes “unduly restrictive and invasive controls” on media operations and could pressure journalists into self-censorship. According to Amnesty, the NBC lacks the authority to dictate how journalists perform their duties, warning that such actions could weaken democratic accountability and restrict access to information.
The NBC broadcaster gag concerns highlight ongoing tensions between regulatory oversight and press freedom in Nigeria’s media environment. Stakeholders warn that directives perceived as restrictive may discourage critical reporting and limit the ability of journalists to analyse and interpret political developments. The situation also raises broader questions about the balance between maintaining professional standards and protecting constitutional rights.
With political activities increasing ahead of future elections, regulatory actions affecting media operations are likely to remain under close scrutiny by civil society and international organisations.
